My '67 was running rough at idle and stinking a lot as well when I pulled up to a stop or into my driveway. I decided it was probably the valve guide seals, so my last project was to replace them.
I got the new seals - both 0-ring and Umbrella - at Napa. Took me a while to get at the valve train - the motor really is shoehorned into the dog house. And I had concerns about how to apply compressed air to keep the valves in place, how to turn the crank, etc etc etc. Finally got it all figured out. Discovered that an screw type spring compressor works MUCH better at O-ring seal replacement than the simpler lever type. In fact I think the lever type is useless for that kind of work.
Upon taking apart the 1st valve, #1 exhaust, discovered that the existing head had been machined to accept positive type seals, and that's what it had. Of course both the o-ring seals and the positive seals were rock hard from heat and age. So I went back to Napa and got new positive seals (still have the umbellas just in case).
The o-ring seals are very tricky to replace. I imagine they are tricky on a head out of the motor. The head on the motor in the vehicle makes it even worse. The trick is that you have to compress the spring and the weird GM steel umbrella and mating funnel thingie to below the o-ring groove. Then carefully place the lubricated o-ring over the valve stem and push it into place. I made a little pusher tool out of the plastic barrel of a ball point pen (just the right diamter) and that made it easier. After all that, just put the keepers in place and the spring with orings is locked into place.
The new positive seals were kind of tricky too. I selected a more pricey kind that are some sort of rubber with a teflon insert to go around the stem. The box came with a little thin plastic guide to ease the seal over the top of the valve stem and past the grooves. Some times the seals didn't want to go on smoothly even with that, and I found I had to kind of knead the teflon ring back into shape in a couple of cases. Lubing the machined boss of the top of the valve guide helps a lot too.
The biggest surprise came at the end of the job when I adjusted the preload on the valves. I suspected that it was a bit off already, as I checked each vavle bevore I took off the rockers, and put them back to approximately where they were when I started. But when I did the final adjustment, with the motor warm, valve covers off, and motor running, it was obvious that there had been little to no preload on the hydraulic adjusters. This meant that the engine had been starved for air.
After I hot adjusted the valve train the motor seemed to idle much smoother. The road test confirmed it: feels like a new motor. Much smoother and more powerful. Even better, it doesn't stink like it did when I pulled up to a stop.
Fortunately the valve train had been maladjusted on the tight side, which mean the exhaust valves were having plenty of time to rest on their seats and cool off. Too much preload could mean that the valves never close long enough, so they could in that case overheat.
OK, it's not a hot rod (it's only a 283 with 195 rated HP), but it feels like a new motor to me.
Did the valve guide seals really need replacing? Maybe not. The main fix here was the valve lash adjustment. Even though these have hydraulic automatic lash adjusters, it would seem that even those don't work like they should without enough preload.
I got this van about three years ago, and am told it was rebuilt maybe 10 years ago. I think whoever did it either didn't adjust the valves right, or there was wear on the valve train. Although I didn't see any evidence of that wear. The valve stem tips are not worn, for example. So I'm thinking it was a bad valve adjustment (or no adjustment at all).
I also powder coated the valve covers while I was at it. Now, instead of peeling Ford blue (sacrilege!) they are now the closest I could get to a Chevy orange by mixing yellow and red powder. I wanted to do them in just yellow, but the friend who sold me the van insisted they had to be orange... ;-)
I'll try to take a photo and post it here.
I got the new seals - both 0-ring and Umbrella - at Napa. Took me a while to get at the valve train - the motor really is shoehorned into the dog house. And I had concerns about how to apply compressed air to keep the valves in place, how to turn the crank, etc etc etc. Finally got it all figured out. Discovered that an screw type spring compressor works MUCH better at O-ring seal replacement than the simpler lever type. In fact I think the lever type is useless for that kind of work.
Upon taking apart the 1st valve, #1 exhaust, discovered that the existing head had been machined to accept positive type seals, and that's what it had. Of course both the o-ring seals and the positive seals were rock hard from heat and age. So I went back to Napa and got new positive seals (still have the umbellas just in case).
The o-ring seals are very tricky to replace. I imagine they are tricky on a head out of the motor. The head on the motor in the vehicle makes it even worse. The trick is that you have to compress the spring and the weird GM steel umbrella and mating funnel thingie to below the o-ring groove. Then carefully place the lubricated o-ring over the valve stem and push it into place. I made a little pusher tool out of the plastic barrel of a ball point pen (just the right diamter) and that made it easier. After all that, just put the keepers in place and the spring with orings is locked into place.
The new positive seals were kind of tricky too. I selected a more pricey kind that are some sort of rubber with a teflon insert to go around the stem. The box came with a little thin plastic guide to ease the seal over the top of the valve stem and past the grooves. Some times the seals didn't want to go on smoothly even with that, and I found I had to kind of knead the teflon ring back into shape in a couple of cases. Lubing the machined boss of the top of the valve guide helps a lot too.
The biggest surprise came at the end of the job when I adjusted the preload on the valves. I suspected that it was a bit off already, as I checked each vavle bevore I took off the rockers, and put them back to approximately where they were when I started. But when I did the final adjustment, with the motor warm, valve covers off, and motor running, it was obvious that there had been little to no preload on the hydraulic adjusters. This meant that the engine had been starved for air.
After I hot adjusted the valve train the motor seemed to idle much smoother. The road test confirmed it: feels like a new motor. Much smoother and more powerful. Even better, it doesn't stink like it did when I pulled up to a stop.
Fortunately the valve train had been maladjusted on the tight side, which mean the exhaust valves were having plenty of time to rest on their seats and cool off. Too much preload could mean that the valves never close long enough, so they could in that case overheat.
OK, it's not a hot rod (it's only a 283 with 195 rated HP), but it feels like a new motor to me.
Did the valve guide seals really need replacing? Maybe not. The main fix here was the valve lash adjustment. Even though these have hydraulic automatic lash adjusters, it would seem that even those don't work like they should without enough preload.
I got this van about three years ago, and am told it was rebuilt maybe 10 years ago. I think whoever did it either didn't adjust the valves right, or there was wear on the valve train. Although I didn't see any evidence of that wear. The valve stem tips are not worn, for example. So I'm thinking it was a bad valve adjustment (or no adjustment at all).
I also powder coated the valve covers while I was at it. Now, instead of peeling Ford blue (sacrilege!) they are now the closest I could get to a Chevy orange by mixing yellow and red powder. I wanted to do them in just yellow, but the friend who sold me the van insisted they had to be orange... ;-)
I'll try to take a photo and post it here.